VanillaCafe
Registered User
Thanks all for sharing your experiences!
I wonder if the schools don't have a scientific way of identifying a child's potential, and they are looking for children being in the developmental norm for their age (which by definition is the majority of children), the final decision is a bit like a random draw. Then why would they spend so much time and resources, not to mention wasting all the time and energy of parents and children, to implement such a process? If most of the decision IS random, it would make everyone feel a lot less stressed if they do make it clear (say having a lottery system after initial elimination of children who don't meet developmental norm or families who don't share same education philosophy). Currently, they make it sound like it's the child's failure, that somehow the child has failed to perform up to their standard.
Worse, some schools may use the interview process as an excuse to hide all the other admission critera that are not suitable to be public knowledge. With the interview process at least the admission appears to be fair. And there's always a reason to give to the parents if they don't have space for a child - your child failed the interview. I do know for sure, as I was told by more than one local Hong Konger, that if the family has connections with school administration their child will not fail the interview.
Sometimes I wonder the reason for such a ridiculous system to prevail is precisely because too many people think "there's not much point in fighting the system."
I wonder if the schools don't have a scientific way of identifying a child's potential, and they are looking for children being in the developmental norm for their age (which by definition is the majority of children), the final decision is a bit like a random draw. Then why would they spend so much time and resources, not to mention wasting all the time and energy of parents and children, to implement such a process? If most of the decision IS random, it would make everyone feel a lot less stressed if they do make it clear (say having a lottery system after initial elimination of children who don't meet developmental norm or families who don't share same education philosophy). Currently, they make it sound like it's the child's failure, that somehow the child has failed to perform up to their standard.
Worse, some schools may use the interview process as an excuse to hide all the other admission critera that are not suitable to be public knowledge. With the interview process at least the admission appears to be fair. And there's always a reason to give to the parents if they don't have space for a child - your child failed the interview. I do know for sure, as I was told by more than one local Hong Konger, that if the family has connections with school administration their child will not fail the interview.
Sometimes I wonder the reason for such a ridiculous system to prevail is precisely because too many people think "there's not much point in fighting the system."