A vote for signing with your baby
We've signed with both our kids and it's been an amazing journey for us. When we started out (at 8 months), it wasn't because of wanting our baby to be "smarter" or anything. It was more purely for the fun of it as I have always been interested in sign language. We signed not because we were expecting anything out of it other than the fun of being able to communicate a bit earlier (hopefully) with our baby. Much to our delight, our son signed back at 9.5 months and the experience that we had of being able to communicate effectively with him led me down the path where I went on training in the US and am now teaching sign language to other families (another story altogether).
Contrary to what people might think, signing with your baby is NOT hard work at all. When we started, my husband had zero signing experience and he was able to sign with our babies in no time. Many of the signs used in the Baby Signs(r) Program are very "iconic" and are very easy to remember.
Over 20 years of research has shown that signing with your baby does NOT impede speech development. Our son spoke his first meaningful word at 11 months and by 14-15 months, he was SAYing 2-3 word sentences and at 18 months, he was talking in full sentences.
As a Baby Signs(r) instructor, I can only say that the decision of whether or not to sign with your child/ren is a up to you and is a very personal one, but as a MOTHER who has signed and is still signing with two very verbal kids, I really recommend it for the enhanced emotional bond that it creates. Signing with your baby really opens up a window to your baby's world that you otherwise might not get a glimpse into before he/she is able to articulate his/her thoughts, feelings, wants/needs, and interests.
PM me if you are interested to know more or I'd be equally happy to answer questions here on this thread.
We've signed with both our kids and it's been an amazing journey for us. When we started out (at 8 months), it wasn't because of wanting our baby to be "smarter" or anything. It was more purely for the fun of it as I have always been interested in sign language. We signed not because we were expecting anything out of it other than the fun of being able to communicate a bit earlier (hopefully) with our baby. Much to our delight, our son signed back at 9.5 months and the experience that we had of being able to communicate effectively with him led me down the path where I went on training in the US and am now teaching sign language to other families (another story altogether).
Contrary to what people might think, signing with your baby is NOT hard work at all. When we started, my husband had zero signing experience and he was able to sign with our babies in no time. Many of the signs used in the Baby Signs(r) Program are very "iconic" and are very easy to remember.
Over 20 years of research has shown that signing with your baby does NOT impede speech development. Our son spoke his first meaningful word at 11 months and by 14-15 months, he was SAYing 2-3 word sentences and at 18 months, he was talking in full sentences.
As a Baby Signs(r) instructor, I can only say that the decision of whether or not to sign with your child/ren is a up to you and is a very personal one, but as a MOTHER who has signed and is still signing with two very verbal kids, I really recommend it for the enhanced emotional bond that it creates. Signing with your baby really opens up a window to your baby's world that you otherwise might not get a glimpse into before he/she is able to articulate his/her thoughts, feelings, wants/needs, and interests.
PM me if you are interested to know more or I'd be equally happy to answer questions here on this thread.