Our interview was 20 March and waitlist letters sent out 30 Mar and we got ours today.
Message was the "met admission standards…on waitlist" one, so now at that head-scratching stage trying to figure out chances, how long a wait etc.
The school website explains the stage1/stage 2 ranking process for Grade 1, where stage 1 ranks by results of the interview and previous school reports and references (and I assume previous school reports and references for a 5/6 year old not so much weight, eg his past school doesn't issue reports at that age as a matter of policy). So interview rankings are excellent/good/marginal/not suitable, and I assume the excellent/good/marginal rankings receive waitlist letters.
Then on to stage 2 where the priority rankings are 1) siblings 2) passport 3) debenture.
I guess valuable information at this stage would be what order things go in. ie does the school work through all the excellent first (by sibling/passport/debenture rank), then move on to the "good" ranking (down the sibling/passport/debenture chain again), and then on to marginal ?
- if so, any idea if the school informs (on request) where the child ranks in terms of excellent/good/marginal ? (as if marginal, then we know chances not so good and to move on
- or some other system, eg all siblings ranked good and above first, then on to passport holders ranked good and above, and then on to debenture holders ?
I only assume good and above (vs marginal and above) as the school states marginal only accepted in "extenuating circumstances", which I assume to mean fairly low down in the matrix.
We have a debenture, so not sure where he sits in whatever ranking matrix the school has - quite a puzzle.
thanks
Message was the "met admission standards…on waitlist" one, so now at that head-scratching stage trying to figure out chances, how long a wait etc.
The school website explains the stage1/stage 2 ranking process for Grade 1, where stage 1 ranks by results of the interview and previous school reports and references (and I assume previous school reports and references for a 5/6 year old not so much weight, eg his past school doesn't issue reports at that age as a matter of policy). So interview rankings are excellent/good/marginal/not suitable, and I assume the excellent/good/marginal rankings receive waitlist letters.
Then on to stage 2 where the priority rankings are 1) siblings 2) passport 3) debenture.
I guess valuable information at this stage would be what order things go in. ie does the school work through all the excellent first (by sibling/passport/debenture rank), then move on to the "good" ranking (down the sibling/passport/debenture chain again), and then on to marginal ?
- if so, any idea if the school informs (on request) where the child ranks in terms of excellent/good/marginal ? (as if marginal, then we know chances not so good and to move on
- or some other system, eg all siblings ranked good and above first, then on to passport holders ranked good and above, and then on to debenture holders ?
I only assume good and above (vs marginal and above) as the school states marginal only accepted in "extenuating circumstances", which I assume to mean fairly low down in the matrix.
We have a debenture, so not sure where he sits in whatever ranking matrix the school has - quite a puzzle.
thanks