The ESF announced today it will be introducing a new Nomination Rights Scheme; essentially a class of debentures that run at HK$500,000 per prospective student.
More information can be found here: ESF Nomination Rights Scheme | English Schools Foundation
Debentures may be new to ESF, but they are commonplace at other private international schools in Hong Kong like German Swiss International School (HK$262,500 debenture) and Chinese International School (HK$75,000 debenture).
Unlike the ESF, however, most private international schools are not directly subsidized by the Hong Kong Government to the tune of HK$283,000,000 annually.
There is a segment of Hong Kong’s international business community that needs positions in English-medium schools for children of their employees, and it is well within the rights of the ESF to extract payment from that segment.
But is it fair that Hong Kong tax payers have to then subsidize these obviously well paid and well taken care of professionals?
Allow me to rephrase: Should overseas employees with plentiful financial backing be given preference for admission to a school where student tuition is partially subsidized by Hong Kong tax-payer money?
Recently ESF has been urging parents (parents being the de facto stakeholders in the ESF) to lobby for increased government subvention. Should the ESF be granted an increase in subsidies and be allowed to tender some of the most expensive school debentures in Hong Kong?
The ESF's argument for subsidy eligibility has always been: government subsidies are required to provide a reasonable cost education for English speakers in Hong Kong, many of whom might not be able to afford attending HK’s other English-medium international schools.
What are your opinions?
More information can be found here: ESF Nomination Rights Scheme | English Schools Foundation
Debentures may be new to ESF, but they are commonplace at other private international schools in Hong Kong like German Swiss International School (HK$262,500 debenture) and Chinese International School (HK$75,000 debenture).
Unlike the ESF, however, most private international schools are not directly subsidized by the Hong Kong Government to the tune of HK$283,000,000 annually.
There is a segment of Hong Kong’s international business community that needs positions in English-medium schools for children of their employees, and it is well within the rights of the ESF to extract payment from that segment.
But is it fair that Hong Kong tax payers have to then subsidize these obviously well paid and well taken care of professionals?
Allow me to rephrase: Should overseas employees with plentiful financial backing be given preference for admission to a school where student tuition is partially subsidized by Hong Kong tax-payer money?
Recently ESF has been urging parents (parents being the de facto stakeholders in the ESF) to lobby for increased government subvention. Should the ESF be granted an increase in subsidies and be allowed to tender some of the most expensive school debentures in Hong Kong?
The ESF's argument for subsidy eligibility has always been: government subsidies are required to provide a reasonable cost education for English speakers in Hong Kong, many of whom might not be able to afford attending HK’s other English-medium international schools.
What are your opinions?