The thing is, there is a difference between what they are "legally entitled to" and what they "can get away with". Yes, they COULD go to Macau and it wouldn't really be picked up on - but they SHOULD be entitled to go back home for 2 weeks.
The thing is, helpers at the end of their contract have already obtained their legal entitlement, i.e. they have left the ex employer with a one way ticket back home (in cash), they have been paid for their entitled vacation leave, so the way I see it is the helper prefers to be paid out for their 2 weeks off (by ex employer) and forgo their vacation leave within the first year of contract, then I don't think anything illegal is occurring if immigration allows helpers to renew their visa by traveling to Macau. It s a different story if the employer PREVENTS the helper from taking unpaid vacation leave in the first year.
The thing is, helpers at the end of their contract have already obtained their legal entitlement, i.e. they have left the ex employer with a one way ticket back home (in cash), they have been paid for their entitled vacation leave, so the way I see it is the helper prefers to be paid out for their 2 weeks off (by ex employer) and forgo their vacation leave within the first year of contract, then I don't think anything illegal is occurring if immigration allows helpers to renew their visa by traveling to Macau. It s a different story if the employer PREVENTS the helper from taking unpaid vacation leave in the first year.